Editorial Team

Dialogue: Educational and Social Perspectives

Editorial Team

Editorial Board: The Editorial Team of Dialogue: Educational and Social Perspectives consists of academics and researchers with diverse scholarly backgrounds in education, social sciences, humanities, and interdisciplinary studies. The Editorial Team is responsible for maintaining the academic quality, publication integrity, editorial independence, and professional standards of the journal throughout the editorial and publication process.

A. EDITOR IN CHIEF

Jonherz Stenlly Patalatu

Universitas Halmahera, Indonesia

Field of Expertise: Educational Psychology, Students' Social Development and Resilience

Sinta ID: 6097376; GS ID: KSXaagkAAAAJ 

B. EDITORS

Asep

Universitas Pattimura, Indonesia

Field of Expertise: Social Education

Sinta ID: 6793146; GS ID: NGes_dMAAAAJ

Muhammad Rezky Noor Handy

Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Indonesia

Field of Expertise: Social Studies Education, History Education, Social Studies

Sinta ID: 6730769; Scopus ID: 58260352400

Paisal Ansiska

Universitas Pattimura, Indonesia

Field of Expertise: Social Education

Sinta ID: 6752426; Scopus ID: 58165975600

Stefen D. Besare

Universitas Halmahera, Indonesia

Field of Expertise: Basic Education

Sinta ID: 6159749; GS ID: ILFIuN0AAAAJ

C. TECHNICAL EDITOR

Munazat Salmin

Universitas Khairun, Indonesia

Field of Expertise: Computer Science

Sinta ID: 6766782; GS ID: -9YlhBkAAAAJ

D. EDITORIAL RESPONSIBILITIES

  • Evaluate submitted manuscripts based on academic quality, originality, relevance, methodological rigor, and contribution to the journal's scope.
  • Ensure that manuscripts undergo appropriate initial editorial screening.
  • Assign qualified and independent reviewers whose expertise is relevant to the submitted manuscript.
  • Maintain confidentiality throughout the editorial and peer-review process.
  • Ensure that editorial decisions are made fairly and independently.
  • Identify and appropriately manage potential conflicts of interest.
  • Support compliance with publication ethics, research integrity, copyright, and other journal policies.
  • Consider reviewer recommendations and author responses when making editorial decisions.
  • Take appropriate action when allegations of plagiarism, fabrication, falsification, duplicate publication, or other misconduct arise.
  • Support continuous improvement of the journal's academic and editorial quality.

E. EDITORIAL INDEPENDENCE

Editorial decisions in Dialogue: Educational and Social Perspectives are based on scholarly merit, originality, relevance, methodological quality, ethical compliance, and contribution to knowledge. Editorial decisions must not be influenced by financial, commercial, personal, institutional, political, or other inappropriate considerations. The Editor in Chief and responsible editors retain editorial authority over manuscripts submitted to the journal.

F. CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Editors should not handle manuscripts when financial, personal, professional, academic, institutional, or other relationships could reasonably affect or appear to affect their impartiality. When a potential conflict of interest exists, the manuscript should be assigned to another qualified editor. Editors must not use unpublished information obtained through the editorial process for personal, professional, academic, or financial advantage.

G. EDITORIAL PRINCIPLES

Academic Integrity

Maintaining high standards of research, publication ethics, and scholarly integrity.

 Editorial Independence

Editorial decisions are based on scholarly merit, relevance, originality, and methodological quality.
Fair Peer Review

Supporting objective, independent, constructive, and confidential peer review.

 Interdisciplinary Dialogue

Encouraging constructive academic exchange across education, social sciences, humanities, and related interdisciplinary fields.
Transparency

Promoting transparent editorial procedures, responsible publishing practices, and accountable scholarly communication.

H. EDITORIAL DECISION

Reviewer recommendations serve as important advisory input to the editorial process, but do not automatically determine the final decision. The responsible Editor or Editor in Chief makes the final editorial decision after considering the manuscript's academic quality, reviewer reports, author responses, journal scope, ethical requirements, and applicable editorial policies. Where reviewer opinions differ substantially, an additional reviewer may be invited before a final decision is made.

I. CONFIDENTIALITY

Editors must treat submitted manuscripts, review reports, author correspondence, and other unpublished editorial materials as confidential. Information obtained through the editorial process must not be disclosed to unauthorized individuals or used for purposes unrelated to manuscript evaluation and publication. Confidential manuscript materials should not be uploaded to external third-party systems when confidentiality and data protection cannot be appropriately guaranteed.

Editorial Commitment

The Editorial Team of Dialogue: Educational and Social Perspectives is committed to ensuring academic integrity, editorial independence, rigorous and fair peer review, transparent publication practices, and the publication of high-quality scholarly research. The journal promotes critical and constructive academic dialogue that contributes to a deeper understanding of contemporary educational and social issues from diverse theoretical, methodological, cultural, and interdisciplinary perspectives.

Dialogue: Educational and Social Perspectives
Education • Society • Perspectives

Published by PT. Gammabeta Edu and Tech