Dialogue: Educational and Social Perspectives

Peer Reviewers

Peer Review Board: The peer reviewers of Dialogue: Educational and Social Perspectives are academics, researchers, and educational professionals with expertise in Education, Social Studies Education, and Social Education. Reviewers contribute to maintaining the scholarly quality, methodological rigor, academic integrity, originality, and educational relevance of manuscripts considered for publication in the journal. Their expertise supports the evaluation of research related to teaching and learning, curriculum, pedagogy, educational innovation, social studies education, civic and citizenship education, social education, and other educational themes within the journal's defined scope.

• Evaluate manuscripts objectively, independently, fairly, and constructively.
• Assess the originality, relevance, academic contribution, methodological quality, and scholarly significance of the manuscript.
• Evaluate whether the manuscript is consistent with the aims and scope of the journal.
• Provide clear, evidence-based, professional, and constructive recommendations to authors and editors.
• Identify weaknesses in research design, methodology, analysis, interpretation, or presentation where appropriate.
• Assess the relevance, accuracy, and adequacy of citations and references.
• Identify significant ethical, methodological, citation, originality, or publication concerns.
• Maintain the confidentiality of manuscripts, review reports, and editorial correspondence.
• Declare any potential conflict of interest before accepting a review assignment.
• Avoid using unpublished information contained in a manuscript for personal, academic, financial, or professional advantage.
• Complete the review within the time requested by the editorial team whenever possible.
• Support the journal's standards of publication ethics, academic integrity, and responsible scholarly communication.

Dialogue: Educational and Social Perspectives applies a double-blind peer-review process . In this process, the identities of the authors and reviewers are concealed from each other to support an objective, independent, and fair evaluation. Manuscripts that pass the initial editorial screening are normally evaluated by at least two independent reviewers whose academic expertise is relevant to the subject, methodology, or disciplinary context of the manuscript. Reviewer recommendations serve as important advisory input to the editorial decision-making process. However, the final decision regarding acceptance, revision, or rejection remains the responsibility of the Editor or Editor in Chief.

Reviewers are selected based on their academic qualifications, research experience, subject expertise, methodological competence, independence, and ability to provide constructive scholarly evaluation.

The editorial team seeks, where reasonably possible, to appoint reviewers whose expertise closely matches the topic and methodological orientation of the submitted manuscript. Potential conflicts of interest are considered during reviewer selection.

All manuscripts submitted for peer review must be treated as confidential documents. Reviewers must not share, copy, distribute, discuss, or disclose manuscript content to unauthorized parties. Unpublished data, ideas, arguments, figures, tables, or other information obtained through peer review must not be used for personal or professional advantage.

Reviewers should immediately notify the editor if they identify or suspect plagiarism, duplicate publication, data fabrication, data falsification, citation manipulation, inappropriate authorship, ethical violations, or other forms of publication misconduct. Concerns should be communicated confidentially to the editorial team and should be supported by relevant information whenever possible.

Acknowledgment to Reviewers

The Editorial Team acknowledges the important role of peer reviewers in maintaining the academic quality, credibility, and integrity of Dialogue: Educational and Social Perspectives. Reviewer information will be updated as members of the peer-review board are formally appointed and their participation has been confirmed. The journal greatly appreciates the time, expertise, and scholarly contribution of reviewers who support the evaluation and improvement of submitted manuscripts.

The reviewer names displayed on this page will represent individuals who have formally agreed to support the peer-review activities of the journal. Reviewer names, institutional affiliations, countries, and fields of expertise will be updated only after appropriate confirmation or appointment.

Dialogue: Educational and Social Perspectives
Education • Society • Perspectives

Published by PT. Gammabeta Edu and Tech